Home » 2006 » 06 » 26 » Like the Supreme Court can tell
Like the Supreme Court can tell

Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Supreme Court agreed will hear arguments from attorneys for the Sierra Club and the White House as to whether or not the Bush administration must regulate carbon dioxide to combat global warming. The decision means the court will address whether the administration’s decision to rely on voluntary measures to combat climate change are legal under federal clean air laws.
David Bookbinder, an attorney for the Sierra Club said “This is the whole ball of wax. This will determine whether the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is to regulate greenhouse gases from cars and whether EPA can regulate carbon dioxide from power plants.” In response, John Felmy, chief economist of the American Petroleum Institute (API) said, “Fundamentally, we don’t think carbon dioxide is a pollutant, and so we don’t think these attempts are a good idea.”
Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant, excess carbon dioxide is. It’s like drinking, when consumed in limited amount it helps your heart; when binged, it’ll hits your liver, kidney and your head. Obviously API will have issues if CO2 were labeled a pollutant, after all, their bottom line relies on sale of automobiles which fuel consumption of petroleum products.
My doubt however is not how clever the two groups lawyers are, but rather how the Supreme Court, who’s members are political appointees, would rule against the very people who put them in place (read Bush). I remember in 2001, when the Republicans were taken to the Supreme Court, they won an election with less popular votes than the Democrats. Need I say more?
As the primary trade association of that industry, API represents more than 400 members involved in all aspects of the oil and natural gas industry.
Photo Courtesy: CMU.edu
Â
Tags: Urban, News, Global Warming, EPA, Sierra Club, Oil, Bush, Hybrid, Activism, Carbon, weather, Sustainability, Environment, Economics, politics, API, greenhouse, Supreme Court
Posted by Moderator on June 26th, 2006 filed in API, Activism, Bush, Carbon, EPA, Economics, Environment, Global Warming, Hybrid, News, Oil, Sierra Club, Supreme Court, Sustainability, Urban, greenhouse, politics, weather 5 Comments »
June 27th, 2006 at 2:20 pm
yeah, CO2 is not a pollutant; we probably need more of it to balance out the excess excellent air quality we all so enjoy, especially in morning rush hour traffic. just roll down your window and see for yourself. gosh what’s the world coming to? we sure need more GHG worldwide.
LOL
June 27th, 2006 at 2:28 pm
let’s see what the supreme court will decide on this. cross your fingers for a repeat ending of ‘runaway jury’ in real life..
June 28th, 2006 at 9:24 pm
I would not put past the Supreme Court to decide against Sierra Club, I think Sierra Club has created an image (read tree hugger) that might work against them.
June 29th, 2006 at 1:34 pm
the issue here is whether or not to regulate CO2 emissions which would aid in the decrease of global warming. let’s see if scientific evidence will prove itself or sierra club’s image gets in the way.
February 7th, 2007 at 6:30 am
I agree with chitra gowda…no doubt thats what I think….
Don Lapre Albert
webmaster@john-don-lapre-world.com
http://www.john-don-lapre-world.com